Image courtesy of the author, Portland, OR, August 2017.

Some More Thoughts on Capital-D Dance

Tara Sheena

A year ago Tara Sheena wrote Some Thoughts On Capital-D Dance. As an attempt to go further into her initial investigation, this writing is the residue and the resonance. The act of this writing produces concepts, embodied and intellectualized, as the term Capital-D Dance performs a constant reminder that that our bodies are never enough. That we are never enough. That there is never enough. And, that is fine- more than fine- that is the intrigue as much as the annoyance. That the capital of the dancer and the dance is found not in monetary exchange, but in the traces inscribed in the studios, bodies, audiences and essays that care enough to carry on. 

I sit with my body and I remember -- Dance has not been unkind to me. The thing about Dance is that I talk about Dance like it’s my oldest friend; my most impassioned lover; my overly obedient dog, recently adopted; and/or a mildly annoying step-brother. Familial, considerate, chosen over time, chosen with faith and skepticism in equal measure.

I don’t know how people make Dances even though I participate in that act every week of my 29 years and counting (how the fuck).

In Dance, you are contributor, interpreter, caretaker. I don’t know how to get around that. I don’t know how to enter a room and not fully care for the bodies inside of it, even if that means my care is not what’s needed right now. I don’t know how not to heed the platitudes of older generations of artists even when it makes me feel like a pouty teen in a John Hughes movie. I don’t know what it means to skip out or not show up until someone gently reminds me: that shit is necessary and brave. I don’t know how to quell the ping of resentment I feel when a director doesn’t understand why you may have to leave a rehearsal early or come a few minutes late. I don’t know how to make you understand what a full life you lead in your psyche alone, for no one at all to see (maybe once). I don’t know how to calm the buzzing after you go into a studio and do whatever the fuck you want because that time always feels lost to you if you don’t do whatever the fuck you want. It is. It was. It was lost to so many and we have lost so many. So many lives and legacies and works and steps and dances and complaints and questions and contributions have been erased (lost) by time (disease). So, figure out what the fuck you want to do.

This is the part where everyone talks about that Merce Cunningham quote about how Dance doesn’t give you manuscripts or paintings or anything you can sell or hang or re-gift. How there’s devotion and sacrifice and anti-capitalist joy (if there’s such a thing) in every ounce of our steps, our presence. How our raison d'être arises with full understanding that one cannot possess capital gains and abundant humanity all at once. I am purposefully misinterpreting here or, at least, riffing for my own context.



Image courtesy of the author, Portland, OR, August 2017.

What dormant-feeling-heart-strings are we tugging at when discussing aliveness, and who gets to feel it? Transience, and who gets forced into it? The past tense of that ephemerality entangles itself with a present tense pain. Fleeting can be like a surprise gift or a soft kiss, but it can also be like fugitivity, the other side of your prized impermanence. One or the other; choose or be chosen.

This writing is an extension of a term I thought worthy of some mental sport in an essay I wrote about a year ago. It’s an extension of a thing I’ve been living for quite some time. Childhood, sure; growing up mixed race in a first generation suburbia that pretended otherwise, eager for after-school activities and social order. Commitment, drive, agility, and all of those things you’ve heard in a Gatorade commercial as my thesis. The central planet creating a moon orbit that adheres to buying and selling a hegemonic dream, nearly drowning in its own act of white-knuckling bureaucracy. Stick to the script. Now, when I Google Capital-D Dance, it’s a different story. I am suddenly living an American dream I likely inherited long ago without trying to: inside a power of my own making while unaware of its exact boundaries or implications or even how to decide such a thing. Language creates and muffles a truth, again. I think it’s that deep. Language kidnaps your make believe and begrudgingly returns it as data or analytics or search terms or whatever. That web page is a marker of some thought experiment that I started before I quite knew why. A marker of some thought I am still thinking.

Maybe you could try it in the form of really disarming spoken word poetry, meets post-Coltrane free jazz, meets Bob Fosse out to lunch with Dustin Hoffman, meets the first three exercises in a Graham class, meets not trying to be John Cage so you end up being John Cage, meets the fact that my boyfriend hated that movie about Bobbi Jene Smith, meets a Balanchine ballet as a farm-to-table restaurant, meets backstage at P.S. 122 in 1993, meets a wide fourth position a la Sarah Michelson (not Batsheva, note the difference), meets your Pilates certification, meets your fake Pilates certification, meets wondering if Anne Teresa and Beyoncé could ever just meet for tacos, meets self-diagnosing your injuries, meets Manic Pixie Dream Girl but gender nonconforming, meets non-Philip-Glass-Philip-Glass, meets forgetting that you met someone on the Internet when you meet IRL, meets your horrible yearbook photo from 7th grade where you tried and failed to be Gilda Radner, meets monolithic thinking, meets that one Trisha Brown thing everyone does, meets New York Fashion Week (but, like, on Instagram), meets a shopping list in the style of a tweet by Lin-Manuel Miranda, meets the lunch break of the union carpenters at Carnegie Hall, meets the debit card you had to cancel because it fell out of your bag on the F train, meets overused tropes in YA fiction, meets a pair of Dansko clogs, meets a follow-up email demanding late payment, meets that one time Björk showed up unannounced to the Movement Research Gala in all white (dash of yellow).

Have you checked in with Dance lately? It’s engaged with Economy, sure, but in ways that make you flinch or perk up, depending. Economy as philosophical conceit or additive identifier are not the waters I am treading here. Economy as resource that can be held, discussed, coveted, conflicted - yes. Have you checked? There are no terms, no limits, no loans, no debts, no barters, no costs that don’t come at a cost to bodies. Physical, hungry, alive, solvent bodies. There it is again: the striving, the problem of my own making.

But, it’s a choreographic exercise. It’s a thought. It’s my own moon orbit, which got in the way of yours, sorry about that. It’s the Kickstarter campaign, the patriarchy, the overdue library book. It’s the text message in the category of non-work related activity. It’s the Dansko clogs, again. It’s that single fleeting moment where you feel alive. It’s something you’ve done before. It’s that one time Tommy DeFrantz told us a relationship to capital is a relationship to whiteness; or wealth or resources or, I do think I am mincing words, but I think you get it. It’s another hour on the train. It’s a simple thing you should never stop thinking about. It’s my body, next to yours, at the same time.


How do we engage with the means of something as it exists outside of the promise of capital? I have seen Dance try, but it fails. It’s ok, though. It’s supposed to.

Filed under:



Join the Critical Correspondence Email List

Tara Sheena

Tara Sheena is a dancer and writer based in Brooklyn, NY. As a performer, she has collaborated on recent projects with choreographers Catherine Galasso, Ivy Baldwin. Gillian Walsh, Leyya Mona Tawil, N...
Read More