Comments on: Dance and the Museum: Sarah Maxfield Responds http://old.movementresearch.org/criticalcorrespondence/blog/?p=8042&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=dance-and-the-museum-sarah-maxfield-responds Critical Correspondence is an artist-driven project of Movement Research that aims to activate, develop and increase the visibility of critical discourse on dance and movement-based performance work. Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:27:30 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.29 By: Dena Davida http://old.movementresearch.org/criticalcorrespondence/blog/?p=8042&cpage=1#comment-557084 Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:09:55 +0000 http://www.movementresearch.org/criticalcorrespondence/blog/?p=8042#comment-557084 Does the future hold a coming together of the visual and the performing arts, but not in the institutional sense? It is quite true that the frameworks and contexts of presenting live and object art have distinct histories and ethos, as it must be because of their different characters as phenomena. But it may be timely to explore the possibility of their coming together, as they do in interdisciplinary collaborations of various kinds that are presented/displayed in various places inside and outside of museums and theatres.
These are some of the questions we are exploring in our project to create a professional university programme to educate performing arts curators at the University of Québec in Montréal, as has Sam Miller at Wesleyan University with ICPP, and at in an April 2014 conference in Montréal (see acaq.ca).

]]>